
Fold a sheet, set eight one‑minute rounds, and sketch eight variations fast. Add a guiding constraint for each minute—change audience, channel, price, or tone. Encourage stick figures and labels only. After eight, circle the two most surprising panels, and write one sentence describing how each could be tested within forty‑eight hours.

Six people write three ideas every five minutes, silently passing sheets or rotating digital columns. Iteration, not discussion, fuels progress and ensures quieter voices shape outcomes. After five cycles, cluster patterns and annotate assumptions. End with quick risk notes, identifying what must be true for the top three ideas to succeed confidently.

Run rapid prompts: Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to another use, Eliminate, Reverse. Assign one minute per letter, targeting the same challenge from seven angles. This forces breadth before depth. Capture one micro‑experiment per letter, with owner and measure of success defined, ensuring tangible follow‑through beyond the energetic ideation moment.
Send a brief primer, one target metric, and a tiny homework prompt forty‑eight hours earlier. Ask for three annotated ideas per person in the shared board before the live sprint. This warms the engine, reduces pressure, and ensures the synchronous time focuses on building, clustering, and committing rather than explaining or convincing skeptics endlessly.
Choose one canvas for ideas, one chat channel for cues, and a single timer everyone sees. Pre‑create sections for prompts, votes, and decisions. Avoid switching contexts mid‑sprint. A stable stack reduces friction, protects rhythm, and makes the artifact instantly reusable for stakeholders who could not attend due to competing priorities or constraints.